Decision support. Each mockup below is illustrative of product UI. The system surfaces; you evaluate and sign. ChironAI does not make a regulatory clearance claim; see Disclosures.

For physiciansA Tuesday in the practice

Your Tuesday with ChironAI CDS.

One clinic day, top to bottom. The schedule has eighteen patients on it. The previous doctor on the rotation said the system had her back; you take her word for it and you log in.

07:15Pre-rounds

Patient one is in twenty minutes. Their pre-visit interview is already done.

The patient completed a structured intake on the portal yesterday afternoon. Chief complaint, history of present illness, ROS, social context, red-flag triggers. By the time you open the chart, the answers you would have spent five minutes asking are already in there. The risk flags are surfaced at the top.

You read for thirty seconds. You walk in knowing the question.

ChironAI™ CDSPre-visit interview \u00b7 outpatient clinic

Chief complaint. Recurring headaches over the last 3 weeks.

Surfaced for clinician attention

  • · New onset of recurring headaches in patient with no recent history of headaches — flag for clinical attention.
  • · Recent initiation of combined hormonal contraception — relevant to migraine work-up.
  • · Reported features (unilateral, throbbing, photophobia, nausea) consistent with migraine without aura per ICHD-3 criteria.
Patient-completed intake on the portal. Surfaced for your review at the top of the chart.Illustrative — representative of product UI. Synthetic case data; not from any real patient.

What this changes

  • You walk in with the history. You don’t spend the first three minutes asking what the patient already told the portal yesterday.
  • Red flags are surfaced before you open the chart. The recent CHC initiation modifier on a migraine workup, the family history of clotting, the contraindication to triptan therapy — you see it at the top, not in the third subsection of the third tab.
  • The patient feels asked-about. The visit starts with the visit, not with the intake.
08:30Patient four \u00b7 chest pain

The differential is already ranked, with the discriminators called out.

You took the history. You did the exam. You have a working impression. You also have ChironAI showing you the differential it would consider, ranked by Bayesian confidence, with the discriminating features called out per candidate. Your impression is already in the top three. You see what you missed in the others.

You decide. The system documents what you decided.

ChironAI™ CDSDifferential diagnosis \u00b7 chest pain

Must review before final

Decision-support output. Clinician review and attestation required before this content is signed into the chart.

Presentation. 54-year-old male with acute substernal chest pain radiating to left arm, 2-hour duration, diaphoretic.

Acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI)

AHA/ACC NSTEMI
  • Troponin I 0.18 ng/mL (elevated above 0.04 threshold)
  • ST depression in V4–V6 on ECG
  • TIMI risk score: 4 (intermediate)

Aortic dissection

IRAD
  • No tearing quality, no inter-scapular radiation
  • Equal BPs both arms
  • D-dimer not yet available

Pulmonary embolism

Wells PE
  • Wells score: 1.5 (low probability)
  • No tachypnea, SpO2 97% on room air
  • No risk factors (recent immobilization, OCP use, malignancy)
Decision-support reference. You select the working impression and document your reasoning.Illustrative — representative of product UI. Synthetic case data; not from any real patient.
10:15Radiology second-look

The morning’s studies came back. The second-look has already run.

You ordered the imaging. The radiologist drafts and signs the impression of record. ChironAI ran a structured second-look on the same study, surfaced candidate findings the fast read might miss, classified the case under the appropriate framework, and routed the time-critical finding through a separate Red-Alert path so it could not be buried.

When the radiologist’s signed read lands in your inbox, the candidate Red- Alert finding is at the top. Not paragraph three.

ChironAI™ CDSXR · Right tibia / fibula, 2 views

Must review before final

Decision-support output. Clinician review and attestation required before this content is signed into the chart.

AO/OTA42-B2.1Critical

Red-Alert findings

  • Open displaced fracture pattern — surgical orthopedics consultation indicated within 6 hours.

Time-critical. Surface to the supervising clinician for action.

Candidate impression — for radiologist review

Spiral oblique fracture of the right tibial diaphysis at the mid-shaft, with mild lateral displacement and angulation. Associated comminuted fragment laterally. Fibular shaft intact.

Decision-support second-look. The radiologist drafts and signs the impression of record.Illustrative — representative of product UI. Synthetic case data; not from any real patient.
11:40Labs

The thyroid panel is back. It is a trajectory, not a value.

A single TSH out of range is data. The same patient’s last six TSH values trending upward across fourteen months is a pattern. ChironAI reasons across the trajectory, recognizes the pattern, and surfaces the recommendation with the guideline anchor that warrants it.

You order the reflex testing. You decide whether to initiate therapy. The system documents what you ordered and why.

ChironAI™ CDSThyroid function panel

Must review before final

Decision-support output. Clinician review and attestation required before this content is signed into the chart.

Pattern recognized — Subclinical hypothyroidism progressing

TSH trending upward over the last 14 months (3.2 → 4.8 → 5.9 → 7.1 mIU/L). Free T4 remains in normal range. Pattern consistent with subclinical hypothyroidism with increasing biochemical severity.

Repeat TSH + free T4 in 4–6 weeks. Discuss patient symptoms; if symptomatic or TSH > 10 mIU/L, consider levothyroxine initiation.

TSH (mIU/L) — last 14 months

7.1
Decision-support pattern surfaced for your review. You order any reflex testing and sign the chart.Illustrative — representative of product UI. Synthetic case data; not from any real patient.
16:50Documentation

Eighteen patients done. The notes drafted themselves.

Every SOAP note in your queue is drafted from the consultation context. Every statement in the assessment links back to the source field that produced it — click a sentence, see the chart row that justifies it. You read, edit, sign.

The patient with the migraine workup needed her instructions in Spanish at a middle-school reading level. The system rendered it. You signed. You went home.

ChironAI™ CDSSOAP note \u00b7 follow-up visit \u00b7 T2DM

Must review before final

Decision-support output. Clinician review and attestation required before this content is signed into the chart.

Subjective

58-year-old female with type 2 diabetes returns for routine follow-up. Reports adherence to metformin 1000 mg BID. Self-monitored fasting glucoses 140–180 mg/dL. No hypoglycemic episodes. No polyuria, no visual changes. Diet adherence intermittent; exercise sporadic.

Assessment — source-grounded

A1c 7.8% — above target (< 7.0% for this patient profile per ADA Standards of Care 2026). (source: Lab: HbA1c 7.8%, 2026-04-22)

Source — Lab. HbA1c 7.8% 2026-04-22

eGFR 78 mL/min/1.73m² with no microalbuminuria — stable kidney function, supportive of intensified glucose-lowering therapy. (source: Lab: eGFR 78 / UACR < 30, 2026-04-22)

Source — Lab. eGFR 78 / UACR < 30 2026-04-22
Decision-support draft. You edit, attest, and sign the note before it enters the chart.Illustrative — representative of product UI. Synthetic case data; not from any real patient.
A note to the reader

Want to see this on your real chart?

We do live walkthroughs with practicing physicians on real (de-identified) cases. The best way to evaluate ChironAI is to bring a case you saw last week and see how the system would have surfaced it.