Three California statutes layer onto every AI-drafted regulatory report: AB 3030 requires disclosure that generative AI helped produce clinical communications; SB 1120 requires that decision authority sits with the licensed physician, not the AI; AB 489 prohibits an AI system from holding itself out as a licensed professional. ChironAI treats compliance with all three as one attestation, not three separate checkboxes to remember.
The gate lives at the data layer, not the UI. A DWC report, a QME opinion, or a closure determination cannot be finalized — cannot be signed, cannot be exported, cannot leave draft status — until the physician acknowledges the AI-drafting disclosure and confirms the determination reflects their own professional judgment. There is no code path that skips the gate.
We frame this as a strength because it is one, stated honestly: a claims administrator, a regulator, or an applicant’s attorney examining a ChironAI-produced report can trust that every one carries the attestation, because the system cannot produce one that doesn’t. See Disclosures for the full disclosure text.