Chiron leads every case. Issac assesses utilization-review denial risk on every case, no exception. Justine convenes when apportionment or mixed causation is in play; Eli convenes on billing disputes; Theo opens automatically the moment Chiron’s confidence drops below 70%. Runs in parallel, degrades gracefully, and is visible on screen — live, not a spinner.
A compound, five-component reasoning architecture — a classifier, a domain-tuned clinical reasoner, and frontier reasoning slots working in concert. Not a single model behind a prompt.
Chain-of-Verification
Every specialist self-critiques before a physician ever sees the output: initial finding, then a verification pass — did I invent anything not in the record? what would opposing counsel argue? would this survive cross-examination? — then a final answer. Three passes, one determination.
Honest reasoning stream
A live, step-by-step trace of what the system is actually doing: which specialist is running, which guideline it just retrieved, which source it just found. Engineered to never fake a progress bar; the chain-of-thought itself never leaks to the transcript.
Ask the Case
Ask the record anything; the answer is grounded only in the case file and the guideline corpus, with inline citations. A hard code guardrail deletes any citation the reasoning didn’t actually retrieve, backed by an ICD-10 hallucination guard and apportionment-citation validation.
Defend This
The system argues against its own determination first — standing in as the defense QME, the UR reviewer, and the carrier. It tallies what it can answer, what it can’t yet, and where the exposure sits, then assembles a submit-ready defense packet.
Human-in-the-loop, architecturally
Physician review/override endpoints sit on every determination. Deterministic engines override the reasoning layer on the actual numbers. The IMR-eligibility classifier fails open, so a worker’s appeal window is never lost to a model error.