ChironAI™ OM · Defend This

Your report, cross-examined before anyone else gets the chance.

Before opposing counsel reads your report, Chiron plays opposing counsel — then drafts the rebuttal.

Two passes

First it attacks. Then it answers.

Pass one · opposing counsel

Where would this report break?

Chiron reads your adopted causation, apportionment and impairment determinations the way the other side will — hunting for the gap in the evidence, the inconsistency, the unsupported step.

Pass two · the response

Here is how you would answer.

For every weakness, Chiron drafts the rebuttal from the record. You decide what changes — the opinion stays yours.

A two-pass review of adopted causation, apportionment and impairment determinations: pass one hunts weaknesses as opposing counsel would; pass two drafts the response.
The result is saved as a defense packet, and submission is refused while any exposure is held for review.
Reviews an opposing QME or UR report for substantial-evidence gaps and drafts a rebuttal letter, every quote grounded in the source.

Built on

§4062.3 record digest

An evaluator-scope chronology built only from admissible records — and a second reader that tries to refute every entry before you see it.

Builds the case chronology per scope: evaluator (admissible records only, Lab. Code §4062.3) or treating (full chart), each entry citing its source document.
A second pass tries to refute each entry against its cited source and marks it confirmed, unsupported or contradicted.
Where two sources disagree — treating versus prior QME on causation or work status — the conflict is surfaced neutrally, citing both.

Chiron recommends. You adopt, edit or disagree.

For causation, apportionment, MMI and work restrictions, Chiron proposes an opinion with its reasoning — and only your decision becomes the recorded opinion.

Chiron recommends a causation, apportionment, MMI or work-restriction opinion, verified by a separate pass; the physician adopts, edits or disagrees.
A server-side guard, in two independent layers, lets the causation-opinion section draft only from the physician’s own decision or a finalized analysis — never from an unreviewed AI analysis.

Impairment and apportionment

AMA Guides 5th-edition ratings and multi-factor apportionment, drafted with their reasoning and checked for Almaraz/Guzman support.

Chiron proposes the AMA Guides 5th-edition chapter, table and category per body part from diagnoses and exam findings.
Checks whether a rating that departs from a strict Guides category carries the documented justification Almaraz/Guzman requires.
Analyses industrial and non-industrial causation-of-disability factors across sources and drafts the apportionment narrative.

Admissibility flags and ex parte log

Objections, strikes and one-sided contacts are on the record, per document — so nothing inadmissible quietly shapes the opinion.

Per-document admissibility flags record objections, orders, strikes and retractions; a medical-record objection marks a record disputed, a nonmedical objection excludes it.
Ex parte communications are logged and classified, and the aggrieved party’s §4062.3(g) election is recorded — never auto-terminated.

Put your hardest case through it.

A live demo on a synthetic case — panel, records, report, billing. The AI reasons. The clinician decides.

Book a demo