Defensibility — ChironAI™ OM

01

Defend This

Chiron plays opposing counsel against your adopted determinations, then drafts the response.

Defend This

Before opposing counsel reads your report, Chiron plays opposing counsel — then drafts the rebuttal.

A two-pass review of adopted causation, apportionment and impairment determinations: pass one hunts weaknesses as opposing counsel would; pass two drafts the response.
The result is saved as a defense packet, and submission is refused while any exposure is held for review.
Reviews an opposing QME or UR report for substantial-evidence gaps and drafts a rebuttal letter, every quote grounded in the source.

02

Every statement traced

Digest entries cite their source and are challenged by a second reader; consistency QA catches uncited statements.

§4062.3 record digest

An evaluator-scope chronology built only from admissible records — and a second reader that tries to refute every entry before you see it.

Builds the case chronology per scope: evaluator (admissible records only, Lab. Code §4062.3) or treating (full chart), each entry citing its source document.
A second pass tries to refute each entry against its cited source and marks it confirmed, unsupported or contradicted.
Where two sources disagree — treating versus prior QME on causation or work status — the conflict is surfaced neutrally, citing both.

QME report, panel to signature

From panel request to a signed §4628 report: Chiron drafts each section, checks the twelve required elements, and you sign the declaration.

The whole QME panel lifecycle — request, issuance, strike, selection, scheduling, replacement — runs as one tracked workflow.
Chiron drafts any of the twelve §4628 report sections on demand, streaming its reasoning as it writes.
Before finalising, a §4628 required-content checklist runs against the draft.
A whole-draft consistency scan flags body parts diagnosed but never examined, date conflicts and uncited statements.
The physician attests sole authorship and AI-assist disclosure and signs the §4628(j) declaration; nothing finalises without it.
Anyone holding a finalized QME report can check it against the stored record by its hash, without an account.

03

Your opinion, by design

The recorded opinion is only ever the physician’s own Adopt, Edit or Disagree decision — and only a physician can attest a report.

Chiron recommends. You adopt, edit or disagree.

For causation, apportionment, MMI and work restrictions, Chiron proposes an opinion with its reasoning — and only your decision becomes the recorded opinion.

Chiron recommends a causation, apportionment, MMI or work-restriction opinion, verified by a separate pass; the physician adopts, edits or disagrees.
A server-side guard, in two independent layers, lets the causation-opinion section draft only from the physician’s own decision or a finalized analysis — never from an unreviewed AI analysis.

Impairment and apportionment

AMA Guides 5th-edition ratings and multi-factor apportionment, drafted with their reasoning and checked for Almaraz/Guzman support.

Chiron proposes the AMA Guides 5th-edition chapter, table and category per body part from diagnoses and exam findings.
Checks whether a rating that departs from a strict Guides category carries the documented justification Almaraz/Guzman requires.
Analyses industrial and non-industrial causation-of-disability factors across sources and drafts the apportionment narrative.

More reasons

Keep reading.

See it run on a real claim.

A live demo on a synthetic case — panel, records, report, billing. The AI reasons. The clinician decides.

Book a demo

Write the report opposing counsel cannot take apart.

Defend This

Defend This

Every statement traced

§4062.3 record digest

QME report, panel to signature

Your opinion, by design

Chiron recommends. You adopt, edit or disagree.

Impairment and apportionment

Keep reading.

See it run on a real claim.

See it run an encounter that looks like yours.